Cost Segregation Explained

What is Cost Segregation?

Essentially cost segregation is a reclassification system that allows you to consider different parts of a piece of real estate differently. Now clearly raw land is all the same but add a building and things get more complicated, by a mile.

I thought maybe it was me but having now spent way too much time researching the topic I realize it is not just me.  The law around this topic is extensive and confusing.

You see as  a real estate investor, or a business person who owns real estate, or even dramatically improves a piece of real estate, such as a rented commercial building that is then fitted out by the renter for their own use, you are allowed to write off part of your expense each year for depreciation.

That is understandable; buildings get old and have to be dramatically repaired or replaced. The tax code allows you to write them off at 1/39th per year.

But clearly some parts are going to need to be replaced more often than that. Think hotel carpets for example: clearly wear and tear and even the need to rejuvenate a hotel o a regular basis means they are not going to last 39 years. Amazingly the government recognizes that and allows you to write them off perhaps over 5 years or maybe 15 years.

Now of course this is where it gets complicated. Because sometimes ceilings, just for example. can be written off over 5 years and sometimes over 15 years and sometimes they can only be written off over the 39 year term allocated to building structures themselves.

This is where a Cost Segregation study comes in as engineers who understand the tax code really well can come into your building and determine, after some examination if and which part of your ceiling, for example, can be written off over 5 years, or 15 years or 39 years.

The trouble is that over the years that sort of determination on all kinds of different parts of a building’s interior have been litigated, and now you also need to know what the courts have said the tax code means.

The most complete discussion that I found was this article  which you can go and read for yourself.

From this article I found this intriguing piece of information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 COST SEGREGATION CAN PROVIDE REAL ESTATE purchasers with tremendous tax benefits from accelerated depreciation deductions and easier write-offs when an asset becomes obsolete, broken or destroyed. CPAs CAN RECOMMEND USING THE cost segregation technique when a taxpayer constructs a building or buys an existing one. It can be used even if a structure was acquired several years earlier.

 BUYERS OF REAL ESTATE SHOULD OBTAIN an engineering report that segregates assets into four categories: personal property, land improvements, building components and land.

 ONE OF THE AREAS OF CONTROVERSY is the distinction between tangible personal property and a building’s structural components. The Tax Court has set forth criteria CPAs can use in making a factual determination of whether property is inherently permanent and therefore excluded from the definition of tangible personal property.

 ADVANTAGES OF COST SEGREGATION include the value of front-loaded depreciation deductions, write-offs of building components that need replacement and lower local realty-transfer taxes.

 DISADVANTAGES INCLUDE THE COST OF THE engineering study, the triggering of depreciation recapture and understatement penalties for taxpayers that use cost segregation too aggressively.

JAY A. SOLED, JD, is an associate professor of taxation at Rutgers University in Newark, New Jersey. His e-mail address is jaysoled@andromeda.rutgers.edu . CHARLES E. FALK, CPA, JD, is an executive in residence at Seton Hall University in South Orange, New Jersey. His e-mail address is cefalk25@aol.com .

 urchasers of real estate can gain tremendous tax benefits by using a popular asset depreciation technique called cost segregation. Using this method, buyers view a real estate acquisition as consisting not only of land and buildings but also tangible personal property and land improvements. The tax savings come from accelerated depreciation deductions and possible easier property write-offs. A taxpayer can use cost segregation when constructing a building, buying an existing one, or, in certain circumstances, years after disposing of one so long as the year of disposition still is open under the statute of limitations (see revenue procedure 2004-11).

Present-Value Savings
Each $100,000 in assets reclassified from a 39-year recovery period to a five-year recovery period results in approximately $16,000 in net-present-value savings, assuming a 5% discount rate and a 35% marginal tax rate.Source: BKD LLP.

Clearly the savings are substantial!

However, this  admonition has been issued by the IRS

In a chief counsel advisory (CCA), however, the IRS warned taxpayers that an “accurate cost segregation study may not be based on noncontemporaneous records, reconstructed data or taxpayers’ estimates or assumptions that have no supporting records” (CCA 199921045).

I have copied Exhibit 1 in its entirety just to give you some idea of the complexity we are discussing

Exhibit 1 : Some Property Improvements Pass Muster
In Hospital Corporation of America v. Commissioner , the Tax Court permitted use of the cost segregation technique for these building improvements.

5-year
depreciable life
39-year
depreciable life
Primary and secondary electrical distribution systems X
Branch electrical wiring and connections special equipment X
Wiring and related property items in the laboratory and maintenance shop X
Other wiring and related property X
Wiring to television equipment X
Conduit, floor boxes and power boxes X
Electrical wiring relating to internal communications X
Carpeting X
Vinyl wall and floor coverings X
Kitchen water piping and steam lines X
Special plumbing to X-ray machines X
Kitchen hoods and exhaust systems X
Patient corridor handrails X
Overhead lights X
Accordion doors and partitions X
Bathroom accessories and mirrors X
Acoustical tile ceilings X
Steam boilers X
That bathroom accessories and mirrors really got me as I would have been sure they would be items that required regular replacement. But the courts make the law, not necessarily common sense, so you have to have someone who is fully versed in the current law as well as extremely knowledgeable about structures, to conduct a Cost Segregation study.
Here is a fictitious example from From_http___www.dmdtoday.com_news_how-to-lower-your-taxes-on-practice-construction-renovation.png

Sample Cost Seg Study for a Fictitious Dentist

Our Partners who do the work for our clients consist of specialist engineers and tax attorneys, as we do many different studies to ensure our clients really optimize the tax savings that are possible and do it in a very white hat, above board and lawful way.

My name is Mary Sloane and my husband Bob and I are Financial Growth Consultants.  You may be familiar with Bob from his LinkedIn profile, or you may be reading this on LinkedIn.

We work with Paul Finestone and the Cost Control Team to find our clients the greatest savings and the largest tax credits legally allowed as we all believe that American businesses are the engine of this great country and the men and women who run such businesses need money to do their job well. By finding them the greatest savings and largest tax credits we keep the money in their hands.

Book a 15 minute meeting with me, https://calendly.com/maryskloane and we can determine approximately how much money or tax credits we can get for you. There is no cost or obligation.

We use our proprietary data base based on thousands of customers like you to do a quick calculation and if you have an interest at that point we can move forward to confirm the monies we might be able to find for you.

It costs you nothing to take a look and if we can’t get you money or substantial savings or credits than you pay us nothing.

Cost Segregation in a Picture

Cost Segregation in a Picture

 

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: